IRB MENU

Consent/Assent Checklist

Checklist for Investigator Review of Consent/Assent Forms for Non-Therapeutic Research 

a)    Required Consent/Assent Forms 

        _____  1.  Is there an Adult Consent Form (studies involving adults age 19 and
                        above)?
        _____  2.  Is there a Parental Consent Form (studies involving minors)?
        _____  3.  Is there a Guardian Consent Form (studies involving incompetent
                        subjects)?
        _____  4.  Is there a Child Assent Form (studies involving minors ages 6-12)?
        _____  5.  Is there a Youth Assent Form (studies involving minors ages 13-18)?

b)    Review of Consent form Format and Style 

        _____  1.  Is the consent form printed on appropriate University of Nebraska at
                        Kearney
                         stationery?
        _____  2.  Is each element of informed consent identified by the required subheading
                        in bold type (research that is minimal risk or greater)?
        _____  3.  Are the elements of informed consent arranged in the correct sequence?
        _____  4.  Does each element contain only content relevant information without
                         unnecessary repetition.
        _____  5.  Is the consent form written in the second person?
        _____  6.  Is the language written at the appropriate educational level?
        _____  7.  Are all complex terms appropriately defined/simplified?

c)    Review of the Elements of Informed Consent 

        _____  1.  Is the scientific title of the study the same as the title listed on the IRB
                         application form?
        _____  2.  Does the consent form have the IRB standard Invitation to Participate?
        _____  3.  Is the Basis for Subject Selection clearly stated with only major
                         inclusion/exclusion criteria listed?
        _____  4.  Is there a clear statement of the scientific purpose of the research which is
                         not directed toward the subject?
        _____  5.  Are all procedures applied to subjects, including method of subject
                         assignment, explained clearly and sequentially?
        _____  6.  Is the description of Potential Risks and Discomforts complete, adequately
                         explained and presented using the required format?
        _____  7.  Is the Protection against Risks adequately explained?
        _____  8.  Is the statement of Potential Benefits to the Subject realistic/supportable?
        _____  9.  Is the statement of Potential Benefits to Society realistic/supportable?
        _____ 10.  Is there a statement concerning Alternatives to Participation? (required for
                          studies involving compensation in the form of academic credit)
        _____ 11.  Are any economic incentives/rewards for participation clearly stated in the
                          Financial Compensation section?
        _____ 12.  Is the standard In Case of Emergency Contact Procedure statement
                         present?
                          (required for more than minimal risk studies)
        _____ 13.  Is the standard Emergency Care and Compensation in Case of Injury
                          statement present? (required for more than minimal risk studies)
        _____ 14.  Is the Assurance of Confidentiality clear and complete?
        _____ 15.  Is the standard IRB statement concerning the Rights of Research Subject
                          present?
        _____ 16.  Is the standard IRB Voluntary Participation and Withdrawal statement
                          present?
        _____ 17.  Are the correct standard IRB concluding consent statement present for the
                          subject, investigator and the witness (if required)?
        _____ 18.  Are there dated subject, investigator, and witness signature blanks?
        _____ 19.  Is the name and office phone number of the investigator(s) placed at the 
                          end of the form?
        _____ 20.  Is the day/night phone numbers of the investigator(s) present (required
                         for more than minimal risk studies)?

d)    Review of Parental/Guardian Consent Form 

        _____  1.  Is the Parental/Guardian Consent Form written in a proxy consent style?

e)    Review of Youth Assent Forms 

        _____  1.  Is the language written at the level of the youngest prospective subject
                         in the youth age range (13-18)?
        _____  2.  Is each element of youth assent identified by the correct subheading?
                         (research that is minimal risk or greater)
        _____  3.  Are the elements of youth assent arranged in the correct sequence?
        _____  4.  Is the required consultation with parents statement included as the second
                         part of the Invitation to Participate?

f)    Review of Child Assent Form 

        _____  1.  Is the language written at the level of the youngest prospective subject
                         in the child age range (6-12)?
        _____  2.  Are the elements of child assent arranged in the correct sequence and
                         identified by a number?
        _____  3.  Is the required consultation with parents statement included as part of the
                         Invitation to Participate?

Power of the Herd. Top 10 University Best Midwest Public Universities only in nebraska Power of the Herd. Top 10 University Best Midwest Public Universities only in nebraska