University of Nebraska Kearney

UNK
UNK
Orange Letter

Consent/Assent Checklist

Use the Checklist to ensure proper submission.

Checklist for Investigator Review of Consent/Assent Forms for Non-Therapeutic Research 

a)    Required Consent/Assent Forms 

        _____  1.  Is there an Adult Consent Form (studies involving adults age 19 and above)?
        _____  2.  Is there a Parental Consent Form (studies involving minors)?
        _____  3.  Is there a Guardian Consent Form (studies involving incompetent subjects)?
        _____  4.  Is there a Child Assent Form (studies involving minors ages 6-12)?
        _____  5.  Is there a Youth Assent Form (studies involving minors ages 13-18)?

b)    Review of Consent form Format and Style 

        _____  1.  Is the consent form printed on appropriate University of Nebraska at Kearney stationery?
        _____  2.  Is each element of informed consent identified by the required subheading in bold type 
                        
(research that is minimal risk or greater)?
        _____  3.  Are the elements of informed consent arranged in the correct sequence?
        _____  4.  Does each element contain only content relevant information without unnecessary
                        repetition.
        _____  5.  Is the consent form written in the second person?
        _____  6.  Is the language written at the appropriate educational level?
        _____  7.  Are all complex terms appropriately defined/simplified?

c)    Review of the Elements of Informed Consent 

        _____  1.  Is the scientific title of the study the same as the title listed on the IRB application form?
        _____  2.  Does the consent form have the IRB standard Invitation to Participate?
        _____  3.  Is the Basis for Subject Selection clearly stated with only major inclusion/exclusion criteria
                         listed?
        _____  4.  Is there a clear statement of the scientific purpose of the research which is not directed
                        toward the subject?
        _____  5.  Are all procedures applied to subjects, including method of subject assignment, explained
                         clearly and sequentially?
        _____  6.  Is the description of Potential Risks and Discomforts complete, adequately explained and
                         presented using the required format?
        _____  7.  Is the Protection against Risks adequately explained?
        _____  8.  Is the statement of Potential Benefits to the Subject realistic/supportable?
        _____  9.  Is the statement of Potential Benefits to Society realistic/supportable?
        _____ 10.  Is there a statement concerning Alternatives to Participation? (required for studies
                         involving compensation in the form of academic credit)
        _____ 11.  Are any economic incentives/rewards for participation clearly stated in the Financial 
                           Compensation section?
        _____ 12.  Is the standard In Case of Emergency Contact Procedure statement present?
                         (required for more than minimal risk studies)
        _____ 13.  Is the standard Emergency Care and Compensation in Case of Injury statement
                         present? (required for more than minimal risk studies)
        _____ 14.  Is the Assurance of Confidentiality clear and complete?
        _____ 15.  Is the standard IRB statement concerning the Rights of Research Subject present?
        _____ 16.  Is the standard IRB Voluntary Participation and Withdrawal statement present?
        _____ 17.  Are the correct standard IRB concluding consent statement present for the
                           subject, investigator and the witness (if required)?
        _____ 18.  Are there dated subject, investigator, and witness signature blanks?
        _____ 19.  Is the name and office phone number of the investigator(s) placed at the 
                        end of the form?
        _____ 20.  Is the day/night phone numbers of the investigator(s) present (required for more
                         than minimal risk studies)?

d)    Review of Parental/Guardian Consent Form 

        _____  1.  Is the Parental/Guardian Consent Form written in a proxy consent style?

e)    Review of Youth Assent Forms 

        _____  1.  Is the language written at the level of the youngest prospective subject
                         in the youth age range (13-18)?
        _____  2.  Is each element of youth assent identified by the correct subheading?
                         (research that is minimal risk or greater)
        _____  3.  Are the elements of youth assent arranged in the correct sequence?
        _____  4.  Is the required consultation with parents statement included as the second
                         part of the Invitation to Participate?

f)    Review of Child Assent Form 

        _____  1.  Is the language written at the level of the youngest prospective subject
                         in the child age range (6-12)?
        _____  2.  Are the elements of child assent arranged in the correct sequence and identified
                         by a number?
        _____  3.  Is the required consultation with parents statement included as part of the
                         Invitation to Participate?