UNK Quick Links Quick Links A-Z Website Listing Office of the Chancellor Campus Maps UNK Factbook Calendar of Events Policies & Procedures Contact Information Registrar's Office UNK Alert Undergraduate Graduate International eCampus Scholarships & Fin. Aid Academic Affairs American Democracy Undergraduate Studies International Education Study Abroad Academic Calendar Colleges & Departments Computer Use Policy Course Catalog Library eCampus Classes Schedule of Classes Transcripts Firefly Academic Calendar Blackboard LoperMail eCampus Helpdesk (ITS) Major/Advisor Change (ugrad) Student Union Student Government LoperCAREERS Telecommunications The Antelope Online KLPR Radio UNK ID Card MyBLUE Blackboard Ektron Login Faculty Senate Firefly Future Catalog Helpdesk (ITS) Email Staff Senate Telephone Directory UNK ID Card myBlue Assessment Current Catalog Faculty Handbook Policies & Procedures The Antelope Online UNK Today UNK Factbook Business & Finance Academic & Career Services Contact Information Employment at UNK Human Resources ITS Police/Parking Services Dining Services Alumni Association NU Foundation NU System
Visit Campus!Apply Today!
Understand Specialist mission
Read Specialist plan
Read Specialist reports
Review COE assessment
Report assessment outcomes
Review graduate programs
Specialist (Superintendent/District Level) Graduate Program Assessment Report 2005: Assessment of the Assessment Process
Submitted Fall, 2005
The faculty members have considered the following:
The department objectives are aligned with the College of Education (COE) Ten Desired Outcomes; COE Dispositions; COE Conceptual Framework; Nebraska Department of Education (NDE) Rule #24; and the National Policy Board for Educational Administration (NPBEA) Standards. The assessments are aligned with the objectives; therefore the faculty felt that the data collected is relevant to the department objectives.
The NPBEA standards provide a guide to ensure that our graduates can accomplish tasks associated with each standard and to participate in an extensive internship.
As a department, time was devoted to discussing the 2002 Triennial Graduate Survey and the assessment data was used to make department decisions.
“When asked what topics should have been covered more thoroughly during their graduate education, 25 principals responded and identified school improvement and aligning state standards with curriculum and assessment.”
Documented changes based on the assessment data were the inclusion of more specific activities that focused on the alignment of state standards with curriculum and assessment and development of a special topics course with the focus on school improvement. This course has been taught the past two summers with high ratings from students.
Data from the 2005 Triennial Graduate Survey would indicate that there has been an improvement in the area of school improvement. On a scale of 1-5, there was an increase from 3.65 in 2002 to 3.78 in 2005.
The faculty members feel that there is an appropriate mix of direct and indirect assessment strategies.
Since the 2002 Triennial Graduate Survey, there has been a gradual move to offer the Educational Specialist Program online. Discussions among faculty members indicate an interest in adding questions on distance learning to the Triennial Graduate Survey.
Overall, department members believe that our assessment practices are relevant and provide excellent feedback for the evaluation of our program.