Character:
A score of 1 indicates 1) the lack of a clear idea of the character's needs and wants; 2) the absence of appropriate research to support concept; and 3) acting choices that do not go beyond the most obvious level of analysis. In addition, fails to demonstrate an adequate understanding of the character in the given script.
A score of 2 indicates one or more of the following: 1) an inadequate or overly obvious portrayal; 2) inadequate research or character analysis to support that concept; and/or 3) shallow or overly obvious analysis. In addition, demonstrates only a rudimentary understanding of the character.
A score of 3 indicates 1) an adequate concept that shows critical thinking and application supported by making appropriate choices, but which may fall short of fully executing a full-bodied portrayal; and 2) may have one or more weak or contradictory points of character analysis. In addition, demonstrates an adequate understanding of vocal and physical needs of the character.
A score of 4 indicates a clearly articulated, original portrayal of a role that shows a high level of critical thinking, excellent choices and follow-through which is supported by full and appropriate evidence of the vocal and physical choices. In addition, demonstrates a thorough and detailed understanding of the character's role within the entirety of the play.
Mechanics:
A score of 1 indicates 1) the lack of a clear understanding of the language of the script; 2) failure to record and perform blocking as directed; and 3) unwilling and/or unable to polish performance quality. In addition, fails to demonstrate either a willingness and/or ability to adjust performance as directed.
A score of 2 indicates one or more of the following: 1) the lack of a clear understanding of the language of the script; 2) a failure to record and perform blocking as directed; and 3) inconsistent willingness and or ability to polish performance quality. In addition, demonstrates only a marginal willingness and/or ability to adjust performance as directed.
A score of 3 indicates 1) a basic understanding of the language of the script; 2) recorded and performed blocking as directed; 3) willingness and or ability to polish performance quality; and 4) ability to make adjustments as directed.
A score of 4 indicates 1) a clear understanding of the language of the script; 2) recorded, performed and expanded upon blocking as directed; 3) eagerness and commitment to polishing performance quality; and 4) exceptional ability to incorporate adjustments as directed.
Rehearsal Process:
A score of 1 indicates three or more of the following: 1) a lack of commitment to the rehearsal process; 2) a lack of rehearsal etiquette such as punctuality and preparedness to work scheduled scene. 3) a lack of retention from previous rehearsals; 4) a lack of awareness of personal contribution or lack thereof; and 5) an inadequate ability to communicate with the director, stage manager, and /or other actors.
A score of 2 indicates one or two of the following: 1) a lack of commitment to the rehearsal process; 2) a lack of rehearsal etiquette such as punctuality and preparedness to work scheduled scene; 3) a lack of retention from previous rehearsals; 4) a lack of awareness of personal contribution to the rehearsal process or lack thereof.
A score of 3 indicates 1) sufficient organization in the rehearsal process; 2) inclusion of all rehearsal materials, i.e. blocking written in script, notes from director, etc.; 3) an adequate log of all rehearsals with the actors' journey of character exploration; 4) real commitment to the company involved during the entire rehearsal process; 5) good communication with the director, stage manager, and other actors.
A score of 4 indicates 1) exceptional understanding and commitment to the rehearsal process; 2) inclusion of a well organized and detailed rehearsal log; 3) inclusion of highly detailed director's acting notes and understanding of blocking; 4) an awareness of good attitude and preparedness that perfectly illuminates the end result of commitment to the entire rehearsal process and the progression of learning during the process.
Portfolio:
A score of 1 indicates two or three of the following: 1) no attempt to organize a portfolio of performance work; 2) little thought behind organization of photos, reviews, outside peer recognition of work, etc.; or 3) no clear understanding of the importance of a portfolio.
A score of 2 indicates one of the three: 1) no attempt to organize a portfolio of performance work, including a beginning resume; 2) little thought behind the organization of photos, reviews, outside peer recognition of work, etc.; or 3) no clear understanding of the importance of a portfolio and resume.
A score of 3 indicates at least three of the following: 1) an adequate understanding of the importance of a portfolio; 2) a good beginning collection of photos from official photo calls; 3) resume with detailed dates, plays, roles performed, etc.; 4) head shot for audition purposes.
A score of 4 indicates all four of the following: 1) an adequate understanding of the importance of a portfolio; 2) a good beginning collection of photos from official photo calls; 3) resume with detailed dates, plays, roles performed, etc.; 4) head shot for audition purposes; 5) well-organized career preparation book, including personal philosophy and self-analysis, for use in job searches within the theatre industry.