Name of Student: _______________________________________________________
Date of Presentation: ____________________________________________________
Faculty Reviewers: ____________________________________________________
| |
|
Unsatisfactory |
|
Highly Satisfactory |
| 1. |
Review of literature |
|
___:___:___:___:___ |
|
| 2. |
Design and methodology |
|
___:___:___:___:___ |
|
| 3. |
Data analysis |
|
___:___:___:___:___ |
|
| 4. |
Implication |
|
___:___:___:___:___ |
|
| 5. |
Clarity of writing |
|
___:___:___:___:___ |
|
| 6. |
Organization |
|
___:___:___:___:___ |
|
Note:
Must have score of 3 or 4 in all categories for study to marginally pass.
Must have score of 5 in all categories for study to exemplary pass.
Higher Level Assessment:
____ 7. The paper has been presented at the local or regional level.
____ 8. The paper has been submitted for publication.
____ 9. The paper has been accepted for presentation at the national level (e.g., NASP).
Note: #1-6 plus 7 are required for "marginal"; #1-6 and either #8 or #9 for "exemplary"
OVERALL EVAULATION:
__________ Unsatisfactory/Retake
__________ Marginal
__________ Exemplary
Name of Evaluator: ______________________________
Previous Instrument, Replaced Fall 2007