Graduate Program Assessment:
MSEd and Specialist
Case Study Presentation
Case Study Presentation
Outline
Assessment & Scoring Criteria
The scale of assessing your (School Psychology student) understanding and competency in each of the areas of the problem solving process when presenting your practicum case will be done accordingly:
| Score of 1 or 2 = not adequate: |
Little understanding, knowledge and skills: will be requested to redo those areas that are scored as "not adequate" and present case a second time |
| Score of 3 = adequate: |
Some understanding of knowledge and skills: make required changes and present those changes to faculty member; does not have to present a second time |
| Score of 4 or 5 = very adequate: |
Understanding and knowledge of problem solving process of case: presentation is complete
|
|
|
Not
adequate |
Adequate |
Very
adequate |
| 1. |
Referral Questions/Concerns |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5
|
| 2. |
Background Information (Brief and relevant)
- Problem is identified in observable, measurable terms
- Present level of performance vs. expected level
- There is baseline data
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 3. |
Assessment plan you chose and why
- Assessment methods used
- Discussion of hypotheses generated
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 4. |
Hypothesis development (data-based decision making)
- Strengths 1) Global
- Areas of need 2) Major Composites
- Cog., Acd., Adpt., etc. 3) Shared Abilities
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 5. |
Summary
- Link problem analysis data with goals for intervention
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 6. |
Interventions/Recommendations (Non-programmatic)
- Address areas of need
- Capitalize on strengths
- Address referral concerns/questions
- Provide specific description of the intervention (individual, group, organizational) and steps for implementation
- Discuss collaboration efforts with family, school, and/or community-based individuals
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| 7. |
Issues of Eligibility |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |