UNK Quick Links Quick Links A-Z Website Listing Office of the Chancellor Campus Maps UNK Factbook Calendar of Events Policies & Procedures Contact Information Registrar's Office UNK Alert Undergraduate Graduate International eCampus Scholarships & Fin. Aid Academic Affairs American Democracy Undergraduate Studies International Education Study Abroad Academic Calendar Colleges & Departments Computer Use Policy Course Catalog Library eCampus Classes Schedule of Classes Transcripts Firefly Academic Calendar Blackboard LoperMail eCampus Helpdesk (ITS) Major/Advisor Change (ugrad) Student Union Student Government LoperCAREERS Telecommunications The Antelope Online KLPR Radio UNK ID Card MyBLUE Blackboard Ektron Login Faculty Senate Firefly Future Catalog Helpdesk (ITS) Email Staff Senate Telephone Directory UNK ID Card myBlue Assessment Current Catalog Faculty Handbook Policies & Procedures The Antelope Online UNK Today UNK Factbook Business & Finance Academic & Career Services Contact Information Employment at UNK Human Resources ITS Police/Parking Services Dining Services Alumni Association NU Foundation NU System
Visit Campus!Apply Today!
Explore UNK's assessment process
Report assessment outcomes
Meet the Assessment staff
2004 Annual Report Contents
Attachment 5: Analyses of Assessment Topics Addressed in the North Central Accreditation Team Final Report
Glen Powell Director of Assessment Date: 11/12/04
The final report developed by the North Central Association visiting accreditation team was received in early October. I have been engaged in identifying and analyzing the topic areas and the concerns expressed regarding assessment at UNK. The review and analysis that is presented reflects my analysis of their findings and recommendations regarding the Assessment Program at UNK. This analysis was conducted by comparing their findings with our records in comparison to the performance indicators in the 1997 edition of the Handbook of Accreditation and the 2002 Addendum to the Handbook of Accreditation (2nd ed) in order to determine the situational context against which the evaluation and recommendations were made. This analysis and the subsequent recommendations are meant to facilitate planning that addresses their concerns. The accreditation team recommended that a follow-up visit be conducted in 2007-08 with the specific purpose of monitoring our progress with implementing student assessment of academic achievement. This is a working document that is being shared with the intent of facilitating discussion and planning and is not a "finished" product.
Topic Areas and Concerns