University of Nebraska Kearney

UNK
Random UNK images
Assessment
related links

Assessment Awards Luncheon February 7, 2007

dr wadkins dr luscher

University of Nebraska at Kearney

ASSESSMENT AWARDS
LUNCHEON

February 7, 2007

 

PROGRAM

Welcome
Jeanne Butler, Director of Assessment

Assessment at UNK  
Finnie Murray, SVCAASL

Awards Presentations

Use of Assessment Data for Program Change
Presenter—Sarah von Schrader, Coordinator of Assessment

Research on Assessment
Presenter—Sarah von Schrader

Most Improved Assessment Reporting
Presenter—Jeanne Butler

Rapid Response Award
Presenter—Jeanne Butler

Exemplary Contributions to Assessment
Presenter—Finnie Murray

General Studies Assessment
Presenter—Daren Snider, Director of General Studies

 

Award Recipients

Use of Assessment Data
Social Work
Chemistry
ITEC
Psychology
Economics
Communication Disorders
Political Science
Instructional Technology
Gifted

Research on Assessment
Psychology
CSP
ITEC

Most Improved Assessment Reporting
FAH
Graduate Program-English

Rapid Response Award
College of Education

Exemplary Contributions to Assessment
Department of Industrial Technology

General Studies Assessment
English Composition
Economics
Philosophy
Political Science
Communications

 

Using Assessment Results for Program Improvement

The best use of assessment results is to share them with faculty and use the information as a tool for facilitating discussion about the continuous development and improvement of the curriculum or degree program. Assessment information should be used to justify things that are working well in the program or curriculum and to identify areas for development or improvement. Assessment information is of little value unless it is shared with appropriate audiences and used in meaningful ways (Palomba & Banta 2000).

Uses for Assessment Results include:
  • Determine changes in course content
  • Justify addition/deletion of courses or changes in course sequences
  • Determine changes in degree requirements
  • Facilitate curriculum discussions at faculty meetings and retreats
  • Guide changes to the advising process
  • Justify curriculum changes and show program improvement resulting from those changes
  • Refine existing assessment methods or implement new ones

 table sixtable one