University of Nebraska Kearney

UNK
Random UNK images
Assessment
related links

Special Education: Gifted Assessment of Student Performance Rubric

Name: _____________________________________ Grade: ________________

Assessment of Student Performance Rubric (110 pts) 

Indicators

Professional

Acceptable

Needs Work

Portfolio Rubric

Selected / created effective rubric for evaluating portfolios; must be appropriate for evaluating gifted strengths
(10 pts) 

Selected / created rubric for evaluating portfolios; must be appropriate for evaluating gifted strengths
(8 pts) 

Selected / created rubric for evaluating portfolios
(6 pts) 

Rubrics and/or other alternative assessments

Selected / created 5 effective rubrics / alternative assessments for evaluating different kinds of products in different content areas (1 must be original); must be appropriate for evaluating gifted strengths
(50 pts) 

Selected / created 4 effective rubrics / alternative assessments  or  none were original  or  one was not appropriate for evaluating gifted strengths
(40 pts) 

Selected / created 3 or fewer rubrics / alternative assessments  or any two:  selected / created 4 rubrics / alternative assessments; none were original; one or more were not appropriate for evaluating gifted strengths
(30 pts) 

Reflections:
Student Learning

Thoughtful description of how rubrics and/or other alternative assessments enhance student learning & included reasons for different kinds of rubrics and portfolios
(15 pts) 

Description is missing one of the main components
(12 pts) 

Description is missing more than one of the main components  or description is weak
(9 pts) 

Reflections:
Grading Policies

Thoughtful description of equitable grading policies for heterogeneous classes, pull-out / resource rooms, special classes, and  seminars (20 pts) 

Description is missing one of the main components
(16 pts) 

Description is missing more than one of the main components  or description is weak
(12 pts) 

Reflections:
Learning Styles

Thoughtful description of effective methods for assessing learning styles, use of information to improve instruction /learning, potential benefits to students 
(15 pts) 

Description is missing one of the main components
(12 pts) 

Description is missing more than one of the main components  or description is weak
(9 pts)